Username :
Password :
           
Taxon ID: 368 Total records: 39,143

Accipiter erythrauchen

Classification

Kingdom Animalia (COL)
Phylum Chordata (COL)
Class Aves (COL)
Order Ciconiiformes (COL)
Family Accipitridae (COL)

Taxonomy

Genus Accipiter Reference
SubGenus Vernacular Name
Species erythrauchen IUCN Threat Status-Year Near Threatened, 2016
SubSpecies Nat'l Threat Status-Year Not Evaluated, 2000
Infraspecies Reason for Change
Infraspecies Rank CITES
Taxonomic Group Birds Native Status Endemic
Scientific Name Author Gray, 1861 Country Distribution Indonesia
Citation Description Geographic Range [top] Range Description: Accipiter erythrauchen is found on the islands of Morotai, Halmahera, Bacan, Obi, Buru, Ambon and Seram, Indonesia (Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001). Countries occurrence: Native: Indonesia Additional data: ? Continuing decline in area of occupancy (AOO): Unknown ? Extreme fluctuations in area of occupancy (AOO): No ? Estimated extent of occurrence (EOO) - km2: 240000 ? Continuing decline in extent of occurrence (EOO): Unknown ? Extreme fluctuations in extent of occurrence (EOO): No ? Continuing decline in number of locations: Unknown ? Extreme fluctuations in the number of locations: No ? Upper elevation limit (metres): 1400 Range Map: Click here to open the map viewer and explore range. Population [top] Population: The population is estimated to number 1,000-10,000 individuals, roughly equating to 670-6,700 mature individuals. Trend Justification: The population is suspected to be in decline owing to on-going habitat destruction (Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001). A recent sudy by Vetter (2009) used remote sensing techniques to track the rate and spatial pattern of forest loss in the Northern Maluku Endemic Bird Area (EBA) between 1990 and 2003, and project rates of deforestation over the next three generations for restricted range bird species found in this region, with consequent recommendations for category changes on the IUCN Red List. This study estimated the rate of forest loss within the elevation range of Rufous-necked Sparrowhawk in the EBA to be c.18.7% between 1990 and 2003, and projected the loss of c.33.6% of forest in its range in the EBA over the next three generations (estimated by BirdLife to be c.22 years, based on an estimated generation length of c.7.2 years). The species, however, shows some tolerance of habitat modification and occurs in montane areas where forest may be comparatively more secure, perhaps buffering its population against the impacts of deforestation across its range. There is also uncertainty over deforestation rates in parts of the species’s range not covered by Vetter’s (2009) study, such as Buru and Seram. It is therefore suspected that the species will experience a population decline of 25-29% over 22 years, from 2004 until 2026. Current Population Trend: Decreasing Additional data: ? Number of mature individuals: 670-6700 ? Continuing decline of mature individuals: Unknown ? Extreme fluctuations: No ? Population severely fragmented: No ? Continuing decline in subpopulations: Unknown ? Extreme fluctuations in subpopulations: No ? All individuals in one subpopulation: No Habitat and Ecology [top] Habitat and Ecology: This species inhabits primary forest in the lowlands and hills, from sea-level to 1,400 m, including partially cleared areas, and has adapted to some plantations (Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001). Systems: Terrestrial Continuing decline in area, extent and/or quality of habitat: Unknown Generation Length (years): 7.2 Movement patterns: Not a Migrant Threats [top] Major Threat(s): The primary threat to the species is habitat loss through commercial logging for timber, and clearance for shifting agriculture, mining, settlements and plantations of coconut, clove, nutmeg and timber species (Vetter 2009, Hanom Bashari in litt. 2016). Another potential threat is posed by wildfires, which have devastated areas on other Indonesian islands, with the chances of such fires being increased by the conversion of forest to scrub and grassland and the opening up of forests for road construction, as well as selective logging and fragmentation (Vetter 2009). Conservation Actions [top] Conservation Actions: Conservation Actions Underway There are no targeted conservation actions known for this species, although it occurs in Aketajawe Lolobata National Park (Bashari 2012). Conservation Actions Proposed Conduct surveys to assess the speciess total population size. Carry out regular monitoring to track population trends. Undertake regular studies of satellite images to quantify habitat trends. Increase the area of suitable habitat that has protected status. Citation: BirdLife International. 2016. Accipiter erythrauchen. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T22695596A93518315. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-3.RLTS.T22695596A93518315.en. Downloaded on 06 September 2018. Disclaimer: To make use of this information, please check the . Feedback: If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown on this page, please provide us with feedback so that we can correct or extend the information provided
Source

Images

         

Additional Info

Synonyms


To Manage Synonyms for Accipiter erythrauchen, click this link: Synonyms.
No Synonym records in database.
Common Names


To Manage Common Names for Accipiter erythrauchen, click this link: Common Names.
Localities


To Manage Localities for Accipiter erythrauchen, click this link: Localities.
No Locality records in database.
Species Record Updated By: Carlos Aurelio Callangan