| Citation |
|
Description |
Distribution
Range
learn more about this article
Foothills of n India and Nepal; winters to Myanmar and Thailand.
Clements, J. F., T. S. Schulenberg, M. J. Iliff, D. Roberson, T. A. Fredericks, B. L. Sullivan, and C. L. Wood. 2014. The eBird/Clements checklist of birds of the world: Version 6.9. Downloaded from http://www.birds.cornell.edu/clementschecklist/download/
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)
Partner Web Site: Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology
TRUSTED
article rating from 0 people Default rating: 2.5 of 5
comment on or rate this article
ECOLOGY
Habitat
Habitat and Ecology
learn more about this article
Systems
Terrestrial
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)
© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Source: IUCN
TRUSTED
article rating from 0 people Default rating: 2.5 of 5
comment on or rate this article
CONSERVATION
Conservation Status
IUCN Red List Assessment
learn more about this article
Red List Category
LC
Least Concern
Red List Criteria
Version
3.1
Year Assessed
2012
Assessor/s
BirdLife International
Reviewer/s
Butchart, S. & Symes, A.
Contributor/s
Justification
This species has a very large range, and hence does not approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the range size criterion (Extent of Occurrence <20,000 km2 combined with a declining or fluctuating range size, habitat extent/quality, or population size and a small number of locations or severe fragmentation). Despite the fact that the population trend appears to be decreasing, the decline is not believed to be sufficiently rapid to approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the population trend criterion (>30% decline over ten years or three generations). The population size has not been quantified, but it is not believed to approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the population size criterion (<10,000 mature individuals with a continuing decline estimated to be >10% in ten years or three generations, or with a specified population structure). For these reasons the species is evaluated as Least Concern.
History
Least Concern (LC)
Least Concern (LC)
Least Concern (LC)
Lower Risk/least concern (LR/lc)
Lower Risk/near threatened (LR/nt)
Near Threatened (NT) |
