Username :
Password :
           
Taxon ID: 55,073 Total records: 39,143

Theloderma palliatum

Classification

Kingdom Animalia (COL)
Phylum Chordata (COL)
Class Amphibia (COL)
Order Anura (COL)
Family Rhacophoridae (COL)

Taxonomy

Genus Theloderma Reference
SubGenus Vernacular Name
Species palliatum IUCN Threat Status-Year Endangered, 2014
SubSpecies Nat'l Threat Status-Year Not Evaluated, 2000
Infraspecies Reason for Change
Infraspecies Rank CITES
Taxonomic Group Amphibians Native Status Endemic
Scientific Name Author Rowley, Le, Hoang, Dau & Cao, 2011 Country Distribution Viet Nam
Citation IUCN SSC Amphibian Specialist Group 2017. Theloderma palliatum. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017: e.T48100463A48100482. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2017-2.RLTS.T48100463A48100482.en. Downloaded on 08 May 2019. Description Geographic Range NATIVE Extant (resident) Viet Nam NUMBER OF LOCATIONS 1 UPPER ELEVATION LIMIT 1,625 metres LOWER ELEVATION LIMIT 1,625 metres Geographic Range in detail Population CURRENT POPULATION TREND Decreasing NUMBER OF MATURE INDIVIDUALS POPULATION SEVERELY FRAGMENTED Unknown CONTINUING DECLINE OF MATURE INDIVIDUALS Population in detail EXTREME FLUCTUATIONS NO. OF SUBPOPULATIONS CONTINUING DECLINE IN SUBPOPULATIONS EXTREME FLUCTUATIONS IN SUBPOPULATIONS ALL INDIVIDUALS IN ONE SUBPOPULATION NO. OF INDIVIDUALS IN LARGEST SUBPOPULATION DESCRIPTION Very little is known of the population size and trends of this species. Only three individuals were recorded during twenty surveys carried out between 2008–2010 at the type locality, however this is likely related to detectability rather than true rarity (Rowley et al. 2011). Populations are suspected to be decreasing due to ongoing declines in the quality and extent of its habitat. Habitat and Ecology SYSTEM Terrestrial HABITAT TYPE Forest GENERATION LENGTH (YEARS) CONGREGATORY MOVEMENT PATTERNS Not a Migrant CONTINUING DECLINE IN AREA, EXTENT AND/OR QUALITY OF HABITAT Yes Habitat and Ecology in detail HABITAT AND ECOLOGY This is a small, arboreal species that inhabits montane evergreen forest (Rowley et al. 2011). Egg clutches of four and five individuals of this species have been found in a partially water-filled, hollow, fallen tree trunk (Orlov et al. 2012). It is estimated that parts of this species habitat are considerably disturbed due to ongoing aquaculture, agriculture, infrastructure, and harvest of forest products. CLASSIFICATION SCHEME Habitats Suitability Major importance 1. Forest 1.9. Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Montane Suitable Yes Threats Agriculture & aquaculture Annual & perennial non-timber crops Marine & freshwater aquaculture Biological resource use Hunting & trapping terrestrial animals Logging & wood harvesting Threats in detail THREATS As the species has only been recorded from one small area and appears to depend on wet, dense montane rainforest (Rowley et el. 2011), degradation of this habitat is likely to be a threat to its survival. Despite the protected status of its range, habitat loss and modification are ongoing in the form of established aquaculture, agriculture (primarily coffee), infrastructure, and harvest of both timber and non-timber forest products (Le 2011, J. Rowley pers. comm. February 2014). In addition, harvesting for the international pet trade, as faced by other members of its genus (Rowley et al. 2011, van Dijk and Bain 2004) may be a potential threat to this species; however the apparent difficulty in detecting the species may prevent this. CLASSIFICATION SCHEME Threats Timing Stresses Scope Severity Impact score Invasive species Virus 2. Agriculture & aquaculture 2.1. Annual & perennial non-timber crops 2.1.1. Shifting agriculture Ongoing 1. Ecosystem stresses 1.1. Ecosystem conversion 1.2. Ecosystem degradation Unknown Unknown Unknown 2.1.2. Small-holder farming Ongoing 1. Ecosystem stresses 1.1. Ecosystem conversion 1.2. Ecosystem degradation Unknown Unknown Unknown 2.1.3. Agro-industry farming Ongoing 1. Ecosystem stresses 1.1. Ecosystem conversion 1.2. Ecosystem degradation 2. Species Stresses 2.1. Species mortality 2.2. Species disturbance 2.3. Indirect species effects 2.3.7. Reduced reproductive success Unknown Unknown Unknown 2.4. Marine & freshwater aquaculture 2.4.2. Industrial aquaculture Ongoing 1. Ecosystem stresses 1.1. Ecosystem conversion 1.2. Ecosystem degradation 2. Species Stresses 2.1. Species mortality 2.2. Species disturbance 2.3. Indirect species effects 2.3.7. Reduced reproductive success Unknown Unknown Unknown 5. Biological resource use 5.1. Hunting & trapping terrestrial animals 5.1.1. Intentional use (species is the target) Future 2. Species Stresses 2.1. Species mortality 2.2. Species disturbance Unknown Unknown Unknown 5.3. Logging & wood harvesting 5.3.3. Unintentional effects: (subsistence/small scale) [harvest] Ongoing 1. Ecosystem stresses 1.2. Ecosystem degradation 2. Species Stresses 2.1. Species mortality 2.2. Species disturbance 2.3. Indirect species effects 2.3.7. Reduced reproductive success Unknown Unknown Unknown Use and Trade Use and Trade in detail USE AND TRADE There are currently no reports of use or trade of this species, however other members of Theloderma are known to be in demand for the global pet trade (Rowley et al. 2011, Kunz et al. 2010).
Source

Images

         

Additional Info

Synonyms


To Manage Synonyms for Theloderma palliatum, click this link: Synonyms.
No Synonym records in database.
Common Names


To Manage Common Names for Theloderma palliatum, click this link: Common Names.
No Common Name records in database.
Localities


To Manage Localities for Theloderma palliatum, click this link: Localities.
No Locality records in database.
Species Record Updated By: Carlos Aurelio Callangan