Username :
Password :
           
Taxon ID: 85,172 Total records: 39,143

Philautus kerangae

Classification

Kingdom Animalia (COL)
Phylum Chordata (COL)
Class Amphibia (COL)
Order Anura (COL)
Family Rhacophoridae (COL)

Taxonomy

Genus Philautus Reference
SubGenus Vernacular Name
Species kerangae IUCN Threat Status-Year Vulnerable, 2018
SubSpecies Nat'l Threat Status-Year Not Evaluated, 2000
Infraspecies Reason for Change
Infraspecies Rank CITES
Taxonomic Group Amphibians Native Status Native
Scientific Name Author Dring, 1987 Country Distribution Indonesia
Citation IUCN SSC Amphibian Specialist Group 2019. Philautus kerangae. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019: e.T58861A114925103. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-1.RLTS.T58861A114925103.en. Downloaded on 08 May 2019. Description Geographic Range NATIVE Extant (resident) Malaysia (Sarawak) Presence Uncertain Indonesia (Sumatera) NUMBER OF LOCATIONS 2 UPPER ELEVATION LIMIT 1,200 metres LOWER ELEVATION LIMIT 200 metres UPPER DEPTH LIMIT LOWER DEPTH LIMIT Geographic Range in detail ESTIMATED AREA OF OCCUPANCY (AOO) (KM²) CONTINUING DECLINE IN AREA OF OCCUPANCY (AOO) EXTREME FLUCTUATIONS IN AREA OF OCCUPANCY (AOO) ESTIMATED EXTENT OF OCCURRENCE (EOO) (KM²) 14286.37 CONTINUING DECLINE IN EXTENT OF OCCURRENCE (EOO) EXTREME FLUCTUATIONS IN EXTENT OF OCCURRENCE (EOO) CONTINUING DECLINE IN NUMBER OF LOCATIONS EXTREME FLUCTUATIONS IN THE NUMBER OF LOCATIONS RANGE DESCRIPTION This species is only known from two widely separated areas of Gunung Mulu National Park and Santubong National Park, Sarawak, Borneo (Malaysia), where it occurs between 200-1,200 m asl. It is known from two threat-defined locations and its extent of occurrence (EOO) is 14,286 km2. There is also a record from Sumatra in Indonesia, which has tentatively been assigned to this species (Wostl et al. 2017). However, until this record has been confirmed, it is not included in the distribution map or in the EOO calculation. Population CURRENT POPULATION TREND Decreasing NUMBER OF MATURE INDIVIDUALS POPULATION SEVERELY FRAGMENTED No CONTINUING DECLINE OF MATURE INDIVIDUALS Population in detail EXTREME FLUCTUATIONS NO. OF SUBPOPULATIONS CONTINUING DECLINE IN SUBPOPULATIONS EXTREME FLUCTUATIONS IN SUBPOPULATIONS ALL INDIVIDUALS IN ONE SUBPOPULATION NO. OF INDIVIDUALS IN LARGEST SUBPOPULATION DESCRIPTION This species is common, difficult to observe, but commonly heard near dense vegetation (I. Das pers. comm. March 2018). Due to ongoing decline in the extent and quality of habitat in Santubong National Park, the population is suspected to be decreasing. Habitat and Ecology SYSTEM Terrestrial, Freshwater (=Inland waters) HABITAT TYPE Forest, Wetlands (inland) GENERATION LENGTH (YEARS) CONGREGATORY MOVEMENT PATTERNS Not a Migrant CONTINUING DECLINE IN AREA, EXTENT AND/OR QUALITY OF HABITAT Yes Habitat and Ecology in detail HABITAT AND ECOLOGY This species occurs in lowland kerangas forest and in lower montane forest, associated with pitcher plants (Inger et al. 2017). Males call from leaves and twigs in the vicinity of these plants between 1.5-5 m off the ground (Inger et al. 2017). It is closely associated with Nepenthes plants and eggs are deposited in their pitchers. Breeding is by direct development, and its advertisement call is described by Inger et al. (2017). Males are 32-34 mm in size, whereas the female is 43 mm (Inger et al. 2017). CLASSIFICATION SCHEME Habitats Suitability Major importance 1. Forest 1.6. Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland Suitable Yes 1.9. Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Montane Suitable Yes 5. Wetlands (inland) 5.4. Wetlands (inland) - Bogs, Marshes, Swamps, Fens, Peatlands Suitable Yes Threats Residential & commercial development Housing & urban areas Tourism & recreation areas Natural system modifications Dams & water management/use Threats in detail THREATS The habitat in Santubong National Park faces encroachment from housing and tourism development which is causing the drainage of peat swamp habitat. It has only been recently gazetted (in the last 2-3 years) and there is no current infrastructure or field staff in place, so it is not well protected at present (I. Das pers. comm. March 2018). As well as the current threats, there is also ongoing pressure for the development of a cable car within the park (I. Das pers. comm. March 2018). The subpopulation within Gunung Mulu National Park is well protected and not threatened at present (Y.M. Pui and I. Das pers. comm. March 2018). CLASSIFICATION SCHEME Threats Timing Stresses Scope Severity Impact score Invasive species Virus 1. Residential & commercial development 1.1. Housing & urban areas Ongoing 1. Ecosystem stresses 1.1. Ecosystem conversion 1.2. Ecosystem degradation Low Impact: 3 1.3. Tourism & recreation areas Ongoing 1. Ecosystem stresses 1.1. Ecosystem conversion 1.2. Ecosystem degradation Low Impact: 3 7. Natural system modifications 7.2. Dams & water management/use 7.2.1. Abstraction of surface water (domestic use) Ongoing 1. Ecosystem stresses 1.2. Ecosystem degradation Low Impact: 3 7.2.2. Abstraction of surface water (commercial use) Ongoing 1. Ecosystem stresses 1.2. Ecosystem degradation
Source

Images

No Image records in database.

Additional Info

Synonyms


To Manage Synonyms for Philautus kerangae, click this link: Synonyms.
No Synonym records in database.
Common Names


To Manage Common Names for Philautus kerangae, click this link: Common Names.
No Common Name records in database.
Localities


To Manage Localities for Philautus kerangae, click this link: Localities.
No Locality records in database.
Species Record Details Encoded By: Carlos Aurelio Callangan